The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous after the A.G.A. for the State informed that the police report under the impugned FIR had been filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 556 of 2020
Petitioner :- Jitendra Yadav And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Shiv Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Sri Roopak Choubey, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents on instruction states that police report in respect of the impugned FIR No. 567 of 2019, dated 28.06.2019 under sections 498-A, 323, 376, 377, 511 IPC and section ¾ D.P. Act, P.S. Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar has been filed.
In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition has become infructuous and is therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.9.2021 RPD
Jitendra Yadav And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
