The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous after the respondent produced a charge sheet filed on 7.10.2020, noting that the Magistrate had taken cognizance on 28.10.2020.
The writ petition has been dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 402 of 2020
Petitioner :- Tayyab Qureshi And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Syed Faiz Hasnain,Syed Riyaz Askari
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out. None appears for the petitioners.
Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and learned counsel for the informant-respondent no. 3 are present.
Learned counsel for the informant /respondent No. 3 has produced a copy of the charge sheet dated 7.10.2020 which has been filed and the Magistrate has also taken the cognizance on 28.102020.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition has become infructuous and is therefore, dismissed as infructuous
Photocopy of the charge sheet has been produced by learned counsel for the informant/respondent No. 3 be kept on record.
Order Date :- 29.9.2021 RPD
Tayyab Qureshi And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
