The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition by the petitioner as infructuous, holding that the petition had become stale by passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4352 of 2021
Petitioner :- Neha Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Maimoona Fatima Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard Ms Maimoona Fatima, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous by passage of time and, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous. She further submits that she pursue her remedy at appropriate forum.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.7.2021 T.S.
Digitally signed by Justice Surya Digitally signed by Justice Gautam Prakash Kesarwani Chowdhary Date: 2021.07.08 13:58:23 IST Date: 2021.07.08 13:59:23 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Neha Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
