A criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear at posted hearings, including the date of the order, raising a preliminary objection.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3852 of 2021
Petitioner :- Abhishek Som Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
This writ petition was listed as a fresh case on 27.5.2021 and 17.6.2021, but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. Today also learned counsel for the petitioner has not joined to argue the case through video conferencing.
Learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection as to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that petitioner has not disclosed his locus to file this writ petition nor he is informant.
Since the petitioner has not appeared to press this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.7.2021 RPD
Digitally signed by Justice Surya Digitally signed by Justice Gautam Prakash Kesarwani Chowdhary Date: 2021.07.06 18:08:36 IST Date: 2021.07.06 18:12:30 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Abhishek Som
State of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
