The writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR and injunction against arrest was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with the consent of the respondent.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail/bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17189 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rahul Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akash Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari , quashing the impugned F.l.R. dated 12.03.2020 registered as Case Crime No.046 of 2020 Under Sections: 147, 148, 149, 452, 307 and 504 Indian penal code, Police Station: Phalawda, District: Meerut.
(b) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus , commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned F.I.R dated 12.03.2020 registered Case Crime No. 046 of 2020 Under Sections: 147, 148, 149, 452, 307 and 504 Indian penal code, Police Station: Phalawda, District: Meerut."
After the arguments were heard at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition and therefore, it may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail/ bail.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid request of the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to apply for anticipatory bail/ bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case of the petitioner.
Order Date :- 4.2.2021 NLY
Rahul
State Of U P
3 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
