Dismissed
Mohammad Irfan and 4 Others v. State of U P and 3 Others
Allahabad HCCRLP/17149/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17149 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mohammad Irfan And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 04.11.2020 registered as Case Crime No.0756 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 323, 354-Kha, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kareili, District Prayagraj.
b) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 04.11.2020 registered as Case Crime No.0756 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 323, 354Kha, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kareili, District Prayagraj."
After the arguments were heard at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition and therefore, it may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail/bail.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid request of the petitioners.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to apply for anticipatory bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case of the petitioners.
Order Date :- 1.2.2021 T.S.
Mohammad Irfan And 4 Others
State Of U P And 3 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court