The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by Pratima Sharma and six others as notice not pressed. The single-paragraph order contains no substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16825 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pratima Sharma And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press this writ petition, the writ petition, therefore, may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 20.1.2021 mt
Pratima Sharma And 6 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
