The High Court Allowed the criminal appeal against the rejection of bail. It set aside the order rejecting bail and enlarged the appellant on bail furnishing bonds and sureties, without making specific factual inferences.
The impugned order rejecting bail dated 6.4.2021 is set aside and the appellant is enlarged on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4204 of 2021
Appellant :- Hamza Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Janardan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
made. Also, it has been submitted, the allegations of violation of SC/ST Act are general and made to lend colour to the story.
Order Date :- 15.12.2021 Prakhar
Digitally signed by SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH Date: 2021.12.20 12:32:04 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the order rejecting bail under the SC/ST Act should be set aside.
Whether the appellant is eligible for bail after the charge-sheet is filed.
Whether the allegations of rape or sexual assault are a precondition for bail in SC/ST cases.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Hamza
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
