Ajay Yadav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Bail application rejected. applicant, charged with murder and looting, was not enlarged on bail as he was considered the prime accused due to recovery of stolen truck.
High Court Bail application rejected. applicant, charged with murder and looting, was not enlarged on bail as he was considered the prime accused due to recovery of stolen truck.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10443 of 2020
Applicant :- Ajay Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Prasad,Gulab Singh,Shashi Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Thus, it has been submitted, the applicant remains the prime accused for causing the occurrence.
Order Date :- 15.12.2021 Prakhar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in a murder and looting case where co-accused have already been relieved on bail.
Ajay Yadav
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court