It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that from the text of the F.I.R. it is clear that the appellant is sole named accused-appellant. The F.I.R. was got registered by the widow lady on 4.12.2020, whose husband had expired on 19.12.2016, thereafter, she developed certain amount of intimacy with the appellant. The informant further states in the F.I.R. that she has fallen in love with the appellant and on the false pretext of marrying her, he established physical relationship with her, which lasted up to two years without any resistance or objection from her. Thereafter, the appellant has wriggled out from his promise and after abusing and humiliating the victim, he extended threats for her life. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that this is a case of establishing physical relationship on the false pretext of marriage. In her statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C., the victim has also broadly admitted and reiterated the version of the F.I.R., but from the medical report it is clear that she has declined to admit her to get her medically examined, so as to establish the fact of rape upon her as alleged in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the appellant has also cited the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court given in the cases of Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs State of Maharashtra and
