A defective contempt appeal filed in 2011 was dismissed by the court due to non-appearance of the appellant's counsel, resulting in the order being deemed a want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; order of the learned court-below confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- CONTEMPT APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 4 of 2011
Appellant :- Bhagwati Prasad Respondent :- Shri Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- K.K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
This defective contempt appeal is of the year 2011.
Learned counsel for the appellant has absented himself.
We have no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
The order of the learned court-below is confirmed.
We record the presence of learned AGA for the State.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 LN Tripathi
Bhagwati Prasad
Shri Rakesh Kumar
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
