Court condoned delay in reviewing a writ petition but rejected the review petition as it merely reagitated the merits, which exceeds the scope of a review.
Delay condoned; review petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 424 of 2021
Applicant :- Allahabad Development Authority Opposite Party :- Presiding Officer And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Indra Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pawan Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
1. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2021
Heard Sri Indra Prasad Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent no. 2 and perused the record.
Cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application is good and sufficient.
The delay in filing the review petition is condoned.
Application is disposed of.
2. Civil Misc. Review Petition No. 424 of 2021
I have perused the grounds taken in the review petition.
Learned counsel has tried to reagitate the writ petition on merits, which is not the scope of review petition.
In view thereof, the instant petition being devoid of merit, is accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 15.12.2021 Mukesh Kr.
Allahabad Development Authority
Presiding Officer
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
