Roshan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed second bail application pending non-expeditious trial. Released applicant on personal bond of Rs. 1L with two sureties. Granted despite narrow grounds as court expressly refrained from merits.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 1 lac with two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35328 of 2021
Applicant :- Roshan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Rai,Ravi Shankar Prasad(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Mithilesh Kumar Rai for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
This is the second bail application. The first bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2020.
The changed circumstances for filing the instant bail application is that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.06.2019; the trial is not proceeding expeditiously despite bailable warrants being issued to the prosecution witnesses; the prosecution witnesses are not participating in the trial. It is further urged that the ingredients of the offence under Sections 376-D and 120-B I.P.C. is not made out as the applicant has been made the sole accused. It is further urged that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case; hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail; applicant is having no other reported criminal antecedent; the trial is not likely to be concluded expeditiously in near future. Applicant undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not seek unnecessary adjournments except to leave of the Court; he further undertakes that if enlarged on bail, he will never misuse his liberty and will cooperate in the trial.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail despite previous rejection due to changed circumstances in trial proceedings.
Whether personal bond can be accepted in lieu of sureties under directions regarding lockdown.
Whether the applicant has any criminal antecedents.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Roshan
Coram
Suneet Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/35328/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court