In this contempt application, the applicant failed to substantiate wilful disobedience of the impugned order. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appropriate expedite application subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1102 of 2021
Applicant :- Virendra Nath Shukla Opposite Party :- Amit Tripathi, Assistant Collector Ist Class/ Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Kumar
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
The instant contempt petition has been filed for flouting the order dated 24.9.2018 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 4425 of 2018, for deciding Case No. 1070 of 2017, pending before the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar Tehsil Machhlishahar, Jaunpur within a period of six months from today.
On specific query, learned counsel for the applicant is unable to show that there is any wilful or deliberate disobedience on the part of the opposite party in complying the order of this Court.
In view thereof, petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to make an appropriate expedite application. In the event, such an application is filed, the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 16.3.2021 Mukesh Kr.
Virendra Nath Shukla
Amit Tripathi
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
