Allowed

Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Jan 2021BAIL/46299/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, the High Court held that the applicant had made out a case for bail. The court granted bail without sureties initially due to emergency conditions, subject to strict conditions regarding court attendance and evidence filing.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond without sureties temporarily, subject to strict conditions for court attendance and filing of charges stages.

Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari Vs State of U.P. — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 64

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46299 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shyamdhar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

¶5

Sri S.R. Yadav, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Shyamdhar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri S.R. Yadav, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶7

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 36 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police StationTahbarpur, District- Azamgarh is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial. The applicant is in jail since 12.8.2020.

¶8

Contention raised by learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant happens to be brother-in-law of the deceased. The deceased died on account of hanging for a demand of unspecified amount of additional dowry. It is contended that despite the marriage was solemnized about five years back, but the couple remained issue-less that would be the cause of committing suicide by the deceased. It has been argued that father-in-law, mother-in-law and Dewarani Sunita Rai have already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court, copy of bail order has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the affidavit. The case of the applicant stands on similar footing qua the co-accused admitted on bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has disputed the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant by showing the account statement of Kanchan Yadav that he has transferred Rs.10,00,000/-the in the account of applicant on 12.5.2017 and the deceased has died on 25.5.2020. But could not dispute that there is no compatibility between amount extended and taking up of this unfortunate incident.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity

¶11

of the accused and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

¶12

Let the applicant- Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari , who is involved in Case Crime No. 36 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Tahbarpur, District- Azamgarh, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶13

(i) THE APPLICANT SHALL FILE AN UNDERTAKING TO THE EFFECT THAT HE SHALL NOT SEEK ANY ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE FIXED FOR EVIDENCE WHEN THE WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN COURT. IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶14

(ii) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON EACH DATE FIXED, EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH HIS COUNSEL. IN CASE OF HIS ABSENCE, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THE TRIAL COURT MAY PROCEED AGAINST HIM UNDER SECTION 229-A I.P.C.

¶15

(iii) IN CASE, THE APPLICANT MISUSES THE LIBERTY OF BAIL DURING TRIAL AND IN ORDER TO SECURE HIS PRESENCE PROCLAMATION UNDER SECTION 82 CR.P.C., MAY BE ISSUED AND IF APPLICANT FAILS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT ON THE DATE FIXED IN SUCH PROCLAMATION, THEN, THE TRIAL COURT SHALL INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, UNDER SECTION 174-A I.P.C.

¶16

(iv) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT, IN PERSON, BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON DATES FIXED FOR (1) OPENING OF THE CASE, (2) FRAMING OF CHARGE AND (3) RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 313 Cr.P.C. IF IN THE OPINION OF THE TRIAL COURT ABSENCE OF THE APPLICANT IS DELIBERATE OR WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THEN IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT SUCH DEFAULT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PROCEED AGAINST HIM IN

¶17

ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶18

(v) THE TRIAL COURT MAY MAKE ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS/ENDEAVOUR AND TRY TO CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE APPLICANT.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Since the bail application has been decided under extra-ordinary circumstances, thus in the interest of justice following additional conditions are being imposed just to facilitate the applicant to be released on bail forthwith. Needless to mention that these additional conditions are imposed to cope with emergent condition-:

¶21

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶22

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶23

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶24

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶25

Order Date :- 7.1.2021 Vikas

Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veer Pratap Rai @ Tripurari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tirthram Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Bablu Vs State of U.P.

Pappu and Another Vs State of U.P.

Surya Bhan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Vinod Vs State of Up