Allowed

Bablu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Jan 2021BAIL/35691/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail application under Section 304 I.P.C., court allowed release of applicant Bablu. Bail granted with personal bond and conditions for future sureties post-restoration of court functioning. Various conditions imposed to ensure trial conduct.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond; sureties to be furnished within one month after courts resume normal functioning. Strict conditions imposed on attendance and trial conduct.

Bablu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 64

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35691 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Bablu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Shekhar Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Chandra Shekhar Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant, Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 237 of 2020, under Section 304 I.P.C., Police Station- Bacharayun, District- Amroha is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial. The applicant is in jail since 3.8.2020.

¶7

Contention raised by learned counsel for the applicant is that the F.I.R. was got registered by one Gajendra Singh under the aforesaid section on 3.8.2020 against two persons including the applicant with the allegation that his brother Jitendra was moron and was ousted from his residence two-three days back. On the fateful night, accused-applicant assaulted him. Injury report shows that he has sustained as many as four injuries on the non-vital parts of the body i.e. on buttock and upper thigh and the doctor could not ascertain the real cause of death. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶8

Learned A.G.A as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

¶10

Let the applicant- Bablu , who is involved in Case Crime No. 237 of 2020, under Section 304 I.P.C., Police StationBacharayun, District- Amroha, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

(i) THE APPLICANT SHALL FILE AN UNDERTAKING TO THE EFFECT THAT HE SHALL NOT SEEK ANY ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE FIXED FOR EVIDENCE WHEN THE WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN COURT. IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶12

(ii) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON EACH DATE FIXED, EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH HIS COUNSEL. IN CASE OF HIS ABSENCE, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THE TRIAL COURT MAY PROCEED AGAINST HIM UNDER SECTION 229-A I.P.C.

¶13

(iii) IN CASE, THE APPLICANT MISUSES THE LIBERTY OF BAIL DURING TRIAL AND IN ORDER TO SECURE HIS PRESENCE PROCLAMATION UNDER SECTION 82 CR.P.C., MAY BE ISSUED AND IF APPLICANT FAILS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT ON THE DATE FIXED IN SUCH PROCLAMATION, THEN, THE TRIAL COURT SHALL INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, UNDER SECTION 174-A I.P.C.

¶14

(iv) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT, IN PERSON, BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON DATES FIXED FOR (1) OPENING OF THE CASE, (2) FRAMING OF CHARGE AND (3) RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 313 Cr.P.C. IF IN THE OPINION OF THE TRIAL COURT ABSENCE OF THE APPLICANT IS DELIBERATE OR WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THEN IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT SUCH DEFAULT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PROCEED AGAINST HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶15

(v) THE TRIAL COURT MAY MAKE ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS/ENDEAVOUR AND TRY TO CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE APPLICANT.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Since the bail application has been decided under extra-ordinary circumstances, thus in the interest of justice following additional conditions are being imposed just to facilitate the

¶18

applicant to be released on bail forthwith. Needless to mention that these additional conditions are imposed to cope with emergent condition-:

¶19

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶20

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶21

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶22

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶23

Order Date :- 6.1.2021 Vikas

Bablu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rekha Vs State of U.P.

Tasleem Vs State of U.P.

Chandrapal Vs State of U.P.

Tirthram Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Srivastava@ Chotu Vs State of U.P.