Allowed

Brijesh Goshwami v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021BAIL/36649/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge discharge and bail application where applicant jumped bail after initial release. Court allowed bail subject to strict conditions including attendance at trial, no tampering, and specific provisions for attendance at juvenile proceedings

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two local sureties subject to strict conditions regarding trial attendance and non-interference with witnesses or evidence.

Brijesh Goshwami Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No . - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36649 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Brijesh Goshwami Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjive Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 375 of 2008, S.S.T. No. 81 of 2008, under Sections 392, 411 IPC, P.S. Bisauli, District Budaun.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was enlarged on bail but he jumped the bail. He further submits that the applicant did not appear before the court below since 20.10.2016 to 01.01.2020. He himself surrendered on 02.01.2020 and since then he is languishing in jail. He further submits that he will cooperate in the trial.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Brijesh Goshwami involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶14

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶15

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 20.1.2021 MAA/-

Brijesh Goshwami v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Goshwami v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailesh Yadav @ Monu Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Vs State of U.P.

Ansho Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Matendra Vs State of U.P.

Suresh Pal Vs State of Up

Mulayam Yadav Vs State of U.P.