Allowed

Shailesh Yadav @ Monu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Jan 2021BAIL/3390/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application filed by Shailesh Yadav seeking release in an esaion of property case involving IPC Sections 392 and 411. The High Court granted bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties, subject to strict conditions regarding witness tampering and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by personal bond and two local sureties on specified conditions.

Shailesh Yadav @ Monu Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3390 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Shailesh Yadav @ Monu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Sanjay Kumar Mishra

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 98 of 2019, under Sections 392, 411, 34 IPC, P.S. Mehnajpur, District Azamgarh.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to FIR, Rs. 6,000/-, two driving licence and two mobiles were looted by four persons. It is alleged that from the possession of the applicant nothing has been recovered. His name surfaced in the statement of co-accused Yogesh Rajbhar from whose possession mobile and money was recovered and he has been enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43791 of 2020. Therefore, applicant is entitled for bail on the ground of parity. He further submits that the applicant has history of three cases, which have been explained in para 07 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He also submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.10.2020.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Shailesh Yadav @ Monu involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 19.1.2021

¶18

MAA/-

Shailesh Yadav @ Monu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Yadav @ Monu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Rinku Yadav @ Harbeer Singh Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Vs State of U.P.

Ansho Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.