Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear or place any representation before the court despite multiple lists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3298 of 2021
Applicant :- Raj Kumar@ Har Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Kumar Singh Rajawat Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list.
Sri S.B. Maurya, learned counsel for the State is present.
Even when the matter was listed on 17.8.2021, 9.9.2021 and 27.10.2021 there was no representation on behalf of the applicant.
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.12.2021 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Raj Kumar@ Har Prasad
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
