Arif Ali v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed in non-prosecution despite non-appearance of the applicant at the hearing.
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed in non-prosecution despite non-appearance of the applicant at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9964 of 2021
Applicant :- Arif Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Faiz Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application even when the case is called in the revised list. Even when the matter was listed on 21.6.2021 there was no representation on behalf of the applicant.
Sri Satish Kumar Singh, learned brief holder for the State is present.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed in nonprosecution
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 2.12.2021 Naresh
Arif Ali
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court