Ram Naresh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
l a [;k 69½ nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= l…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 30112 o"kZ 2021
jke ujs'k &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 59 o"kZ 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 8@22 ,u0 Mh0 ih0 ,l0 ,DV] Fkkuk th vkj ih okjk.klh] ftyk okjk.klh esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds dCts ls 110 xzke vyizktksye cjken gksuk crk;k tkrk gSA iz'uxr cjkenxh dk dksbZ Lora= lk{kh ugha gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd /kkjk 50 ,u0 Mh0 ih0 ,l0 ,DV ds izko/kku dk vuqikyu ugha fd;k x;kA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd iz'uxr cjken oLrq dks fof/k foKku iz;ksx'kkyk ijh{k.k gsrq Hkstk x;k gS ijUrq vHkh rd dksbZ vk[;k izkIr ugha gqbZ gS vkosnd dk dksbZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA vkosnd fnukad 30&04&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa og tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jai Nishchay
- respondent
state through addl. inspector medical store dept. Pusa
Coram
емухдкйёшквжтуп датт
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/30112/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court