Karan v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
What did the court decide?
Release on bail under Sections 21/22 of NDPS Act via personal bond and sureties.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Release on bail under Sections 21/22 of NDPS Act via personal bond and sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28788 of 2021
Applicant :- Karan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Indra Jit Singh,Om Prakash Singh (Senior Adv.)
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that 270 gram contraband article, i.e., Diazepam is said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submits that there is no compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act, hence the recovery is bad in the eyes of law. The applicant has no criminal history with respect to the N.D.P.S. Act. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 04.02.2021. Criminal history of the applicant has properly been explained in paragraph nos. 15, 16, 17 and 18 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Karan , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 52 of 2021, under Sections- 21/22 of the NDPS Act, Police Station- Kotwali Tirwa, District- Kannauj, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to
prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 10.8.2021 Arti
Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Kumar Singh Date: 2021.08.10 16:47:02 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Karan
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court