Allowed

Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Aug 2021BAIL/28418/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court entertained a bail application under Section 307 IPC. Considering the prima facie satisfaction and various grounds including pandemic jail overcrowding, the court granted bail to the applicant on furnishing sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 120 of 2021 under Sections 307/352/504/506 IPC upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 71

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28418 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Nasir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Mohd Nasir, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that no offence under section 307 IPC is made out against the applicant, as he has not assaulted nor had caused any injury to the inured Salman. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.03.2021. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.

¶9

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in

¶10

(2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶11

Let applicant- Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 120 of 2021, under Sections307/352/504/506 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District Banda, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶12

The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶13

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶14

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶15

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶16

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶17

In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶19

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶20

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶21

Order Date :- 10.8.2021 Vikram

Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Sonkar @ Jeetu Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Das Bengali Vs State of U.P.

Rajan Singh @ Shailendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Zakir Urf Chuha Vs State of U.P.

Karan Vs State of Up

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Khurshid Vs State of U.P.