Allowed

Satendra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2021BAIL/23555/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted bail to the applicant in a case under the U.P. Gangster Act, 1986. Since the applicant had already been released on bail for the specific case in the gang chart and no flight risk was evident, the Court ordered his release on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions of bail.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties subject to specified conditions.

Satendra Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23555 of 2021

¶3

Applicant : Satendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Srivastava,Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J .

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.318 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster Act and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Zamania, District Ghazipur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per gang chart one case is mentioned against the applicant in which he has been enlarged on bail from the court below which has been explained in paras 6 and 7 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. He further submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.3.2021.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail, but concedes the factual aspects of the matter.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, enlargement of applicant in the case mentioned in the gang chart, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Satendra Yadav involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses

¶11

are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.

¶17

O rder Date :- 2.8.2021

¶18

m.a.

¶19

Digitally signed by Justice Ali Zamin Date: 2021.08.06 18:44:13 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satendra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satendra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naved Vs State of U.P.

Bablu Vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Amar Rathi Vs State of U.P.

Mithun Alias Shivam Sankhwar Vs State of U.P.

Anwar Vs State of U.P.