Allowed

Anwar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2021BAIL/22948/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was filed by the applicant seeking release in a case involving cattle slaughter. The High Court, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the charge, granted bail subject to stringent conditions regarding presence in court, non-tampering with witnesses, and cooperation during the trial.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Anwar Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22948 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Anwar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Wajid Ali,Syed Mohammed Jafer Husain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 153 of 2021, under Sections 3/5Ka/8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Kotwali, District Fatehpur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per FIR version, on 12.03.2021 from the possession of applicant 25.0 Kg. beef, one Pahsul, one axe, one knife and three chhuries were recovered. He further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. At the time of recovery another case crime has been registered in which he has been enlarged on bail, which is explained in para 10 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. He also submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.04.2021.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, nature of offence and perusing the materials on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Anwar involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶10

(ii The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not

¶11

pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 2.8.2021 MAA/-

¶18

Digitally signed by Justice Ali Zamin Date: 2021.08.03 12:24:58 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anwar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naved Vs State of U.P.

Bablu Vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Amar Rathi Vs State of U.P.

Mithun Alias Shivam Sankhwar Vs State of U.P.

Satendra Yadav Vs State of U.P.