Allowed

Tully Lal @ Amit v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jul 2021BAIL/23399/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal bail application under the UP Gangsters Act, the High Court of Allahabad granted bail to the applicant, who had been in custody since October 2020. The court imposed standard and specific conditions regarding witness tampering, attendance, and prosecution cooperation.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties of the like amount.

Tully Lal @ Amit Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23399 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Tully Lal @ Amit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gyan Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.443 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Bithoor, District Kanpur Nagar.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per gang chart three cases have been shown against the applicant in which he has been granted bail by the court below. Apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart there is no other criminal case is registered. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next contended that the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.10.2020.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, enlargement of accused on bail in the cases registered in the gang chart, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Tully Lal @ Amit involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall

¶11

be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 20.7.2021 Jitendra

¶18

Digitally signed by Justice Ali Zamin Date: 2021.07.20 17:48:03 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tully Lal @ Amit v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tully Lal @ Amit v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Waseem @ Banta Vs State of U.P.

Asif Vs State of U.P.

Sandeep Vs State of U.P.

Nishar Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Prameela Vs State of U.P.

Banne Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh