Allowed

Mohd Waseem @ Banta v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Jul 2021BAIL/47562/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 47562 of 2020, the Single Judge dismissed the State's objection regarding the applicant's extensive criminal record and, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the charge, granted bail to the applicant subject to strict conditions regarding appearance and tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Mohd Waseem @ Banta released on bail on personal bond and two local sureties subject to strict conditions of appearance and non-tampering.

Mohd Waseem @ Banta Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47562 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Mohd Waseem @ Banta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bal Ram Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 297 of 2019, under Section 392 IPC, Police Station Kidwai Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that role of the applicant is identical to the co-accused Shubham Singh who has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.06.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14157 of 2020 therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is next contended that applicant has a criminal history of 30 cases which have been explained in Paragraph- 17 of the affidavit. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Applicant and he is languishing in jail since 16.06.2020.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by submitting that applicant has a criminal history of 30 cases, therefore, he is not entitled for bail.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, enlargement of co-accused on bail, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Mohd Waseem @ Banta involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his/her furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not

¶11

pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 19.7.2021 Israr

Mohd Waseem @ Banta v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Waseem @ Banta v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahadat Ali Vs State of U.P.

Sachin @ Chhotu Vs State of U.P.

Bhure Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Mansih @ Ainda Vs State of U.P.

Krishna @ Gaurav Vs State of U.P.

Farman Vs State of U P