Allowed bail to the applicant Sonu @ Parvej Alam involved in a case under the U.P. Gangster Act. The applicant is to be released on furnishing a personal bond with sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding court presence and procedures, while complying with COVID-19 directions.
Recorded order date is for reference purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16168 of 2021
Applicant :- Sonu @ Parvej Alam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Sahu,Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
The Court convened through video conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
According to the gang chart, the applicant is said to have been involved in eight criminal cases in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. It is urged that all the cases were registered within a month; the applicant is not a member of any gang; the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.12.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Let the applicant, Sonu @ Parvej Alam, involved in Case Crime No. 39 of 2021, under section 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Teela Mod, District Ghaziabad, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vi) The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
(vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In view of the extraordinary situation prevailing in the State due to Covid-19, the directions of this Court dated 6.4.2020 passed in Public Interest Litigation No. 564 of 2020 (In re vs. State of U.P.), shall also be complied.
The order reads thus:
"Looking to impediments in arranging sureties because of lockdown, while invoking powers under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, we deem it appropriate to order that all the accused-applicants whose bail applications came to be allowed on or after 15th March, 2020 but have not been released due to non-availability of sureties as a consequence to lockdown may be released on executing personal bond as ordered by the Court or to the satisfaction of the jail authorities where such accused is imprisoned, provided the accusedapplicants undertakes to furnish required sureties within a period of one month from the date of his/her actual release."
Order Date :- 24.6.2021 Atul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant involved in gangster cases is eligible for bail with stringent conditions.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Sonu @ Parvej Alam
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
