Allowed

Pravesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2021BAIL/15356/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by Pravesh Kumar in a case involving Sections 307, 504, 506 IPC. Court granted bail on personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific conditions including appearance and trial conclusion within one year.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions including appearance and undertaking not to seek adjournments.

Pravesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15356 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Pravesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Onkar Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶6

This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.07 of 2021, under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Mirahchi, District Etah.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. As per injury report, the injured Ram Niwash has received only one gun shot injury, which is simple in nature. He further submits that co-accused Durgesh has already been granted bail by the learned court below, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure No.6 to the bail application. He further submits that applicant is having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 08.01.2021.

¶8

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposes the application for bail.

¶9

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶10

Let the applicant- Pravesh Kumar , who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not

¶12

seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

(v) The Trial Court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial within a period of one year after the release of the applicant.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.

¶19

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶20

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶21

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶22

Order Date :- 9.9.2021

¶23

Ajeet

¶24

Digitally signed by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav Date: 2021.09.09 17:07:34 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pravesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ashutosh Kumar Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Devesh Vs State of U.P.

Taki Mohammad Vs State of U.P.

Sudhir Vs State of U.P.