Allowed

Amir v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Feb 2021BAIL/14250/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court considered a bail application under Section 302 IPC challenging FIR deficiencies and filing delays. The single judge granted bail subject to strict conditions, noting the applicant returned with a post-mortem and the case is pending remission.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to conditions: appearing with advocates, providing security, not leaving the town, and refraining from tampering with evidence.

Amir Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14250 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Amir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Roshan Kumar Singh,Himanshu Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anand Kumar Mishra,Rajiv Kumar Mishra

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd vkfej dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 380 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 302] 201] 120ch Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk fiy[kqok] ftyk gkiqM+ esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd dks ekSds ij ugha idM+k x;k gS] iqfyl i w WNrkaN ds cgkus vkosnd dks mlds ?kj ls mBkdj ys x;h vkSj bl izdj.k esa >wBk QWlk fn;k] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 2 fnu foyEc ls fy[kk;h x;h gS ftldk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k] vkosnd dks ?kVuk dkfjr djrs gq, fdlh us ugha ns[kk gS] vkosnd ds ikl ls vijk/k esa vkfyIr gksus okyh dksbZ oLrq cjken ugha gq;h gS] ,d= dh x;h dWky&fMVsy iwjd 'kiFki= ds lkFk layXud la0 1 d s :i esa nkf[ky dh x;h gS] ftlesa lansg izrhr gksrk gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr dkfey dh tekur tekur vkosnu i= la0 3653 lu 2020 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 6&2&2020 }kjk Lohd`r dh tk pqdh gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 21&8&2019 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor ugha djsxkA

¶8

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd ,oa :dlkuk ds e/; voS/k laca/k ds pyrs vkosnd }kjk mDr ?kVuk dkfjr dh x;h gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa dk voyksdu djus ,oa bl ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk dks bafxr djus ds fy, lk{; ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶10

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu i{k ds lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsN+NkM+ ugha djsxk ,oa vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶12

2& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og U;k;ky; ds le{k bl vk’k; dk opu i= nkf[ky djsxk fd og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶13

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶14

4& ;fn vkosnd tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx djrk gqvk ik;k tkrk gS rks U;k;ky; }kjk mlds fo:) /kkjk 82 na0iz0la0 ds rgr ;k vU; mi;qDr U;kf;d dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gS vkSj ;fn vkosnd U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha gksrk gS rks mlds fo:) /kkjk 174&, Hkk0na0fo0 ds rgr dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA

¶15

5& vkosnd l= ijh{k.k ds izkjfEHkd frfFk ij] vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus dh frfFk ij ,oa /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr c;ku gksus dh frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr jgsxk] ,slk u djus ij U;k;ky; }kjk mlds fo:) mi;qDr fof/kd dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA

¶16

6& fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd ds tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr fopkj.k dk Rofjr :i ls fuLrkj.k djus dk iz;kl fd;k tk,xkA

¶17

7& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶18

8& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶19

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj

¶20

gksxkA

¶21

fn0 % 17&2&2021 ds0lh0flag

¶22

2 of 2

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Kumar Agarawal Vs State of U.P.

Kamil Vs State of U.P.

Manvir and Another Vs State of U.P.

Jai Raj Singh Vs State of U.P.

Rishabh @ Deepanshu Vs State of U.P.

Alhaz @ Minhaz Vs State of U.P.