Dismissed

Manvir and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2020BAIL/43805/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application under the UP Gangsters & Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, the court considering constitutional rights under Article 21 directed dismissal of the bail application. Striking stay orders issued earlier, and directed that the applicant be kept in judicial custody without bail until arrears.

What did the court decide?

Stay orders struck; bail denied; applicant to remain in judicial custody till arrears.

Manvir and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43805 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Manvir And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Bais Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosndx.k euohj ,oa vfuy dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 294 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 2/3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk cM+xkWo] ftyk lgkjuiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosndx.k dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mUgksaus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosndx.k ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr oknksa esa mudh tekur Lohd`r gks pqdh gS ftldk Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosndx.k fdlh xSax ds yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gSA vkosndx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk os bl izdj.k esa fn0 10&8&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosndx.k dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosndx.k Qjkj ugha gksaxs vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsaxsA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosndx.k ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh

¶10

Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosndx.k dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks&nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosndx.k foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;saxs@/kedk;saxs ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsaxsA

¶12

2& vkosndx.k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsaxsA

¶13

3& vkosndx.k tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksaxs u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsaxsA

¶14

4& vkosndx.k dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mudh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶15

5& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosndx.k dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsaxsA

¶16

6& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶17

7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj

¶19

gksxkA

¶20

fn0 % 10&12&2020 ds0lh0flag

¶21

2 of 2

Manvir and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manvir and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra @ Karu Vs State of U.P.

Guddu Vs State of U.P.

Islu@ Islamuddin Vs State of U.P.

Vinay Saxena Vs State of U.P.

Kamil Vs State of U.P.

Ramu Gupta Vs State of U.P.