Allowed

Rohit Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2021BAIL/12108/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Allahabad allowed bail to Rohit Singh, a student accused of cheating and theft, relying on factors like prima facie satisfaction of charges, reformative theory, and Article 21, directing expedited trial within six months.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail along with personal bond and two sureties (one family member) with standard conditions for release and appearance.

Rohit Singh Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 71

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12108 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Rohit Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that applicant is a student and has nothing to do with the alleged transaction which has been made by the Narad Barnwal and others, he is innocent and he has been falsely implicated by the police on the behest of the complainant in order to ruin the educational carrier of the applicant, the said fact has been mentioned in para 10 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.01.2021. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let applicant- Rohit Singh , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 390 of 2020, under Sections- 419, 420, 379 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Ballia, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties (One should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶14

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶15

In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

¶17

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶18

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶19

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶20

Order Date :- 15.7.2021 Arti

Rohit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Gupta @ Bachcna Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Raju Gupta @ Bachcha Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Prabhunath Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sandeep Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Azad Vs State of U.P.

Ramu Yadav Vs State of U.P.