Allowed

Prabhunath Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Jun 2021BAIL/8709/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to the applicant facing trial for offences under the N.D.P.S. Act and Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The court held that the compliance of Section 50 N.D.P.S. Act and the voluntariness of recovery are questions for trial. Bail was granted subject to personal bond and sureties with strict conditions regarding court appearances.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two heavy sureties (one family member).

Prabhunath Singh Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8709 of 2021 Applicant :- Prabhunath Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Mishra,Pawan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶4

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive, on the basis of false and planted recovery of; 228 gram Ganja, 1230 Nitravet tablets (686.34 gram), 470 Nitrosum tablets 10 MG (352.03 gram), 288 Vinspasmo Forte capsules (126.36 gm), Spasmoopraxivan plus capsules (357.57 gram), one fensadril syrup, 5 corex syrup (500 gram), and one vial Onrex syrup 100 gram recovered from the house of the applicant and there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He runs a medical store. It is further contended that mandatory provisions of Section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act has not been complied with. At the stage of consideration of bail it cannot be decided whether offer given to the applicant and his consent obtained by voluntary. These are the questions of fact which can be determined only during trial and not at the present stage. The applicant has history one criminal case. It is also submitted that the applicant is jail since 15.12.2020 and he undertakes that he will not misuse liberty, if granted.

¶5

Learned counsel for the department as well as learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail.

¶6

Considering the facts of the case and keeping in mind the arguments advanced on behalf of the parties, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering of witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the application is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶7

Let the applicant - Prabhunath Singh involved in Case Crime No. 559 of 2020, under Sections 8/20/22 N.D.P.S. Act, 18(A)/27(A) Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Police Station Nichlaul, District Maharajganj be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two heavy sureties (one should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following

¶8

condition:-

¶9

(i) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶10

(ii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law

¶12

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case. The trial court shall endeavour to decide the trial expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

¶13

In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶14

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶15

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶17

Order Date :- 18.6.2021 Digamber

Prabhunath Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhunath Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rais Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Shekhar Vs State of U.P.

Ramlal Nishad Vs State of U.P.

Ravi Vs State of U.P.

Vijay Pal Vs State of U.P.

Bablu Singh @ Harvijay Singh Vs State of U.P.