The Single Judge dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the instant application had already rendered the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9887 of 2021
Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar @ Golu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Shukla,Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard Santosh Kumar Singh Paliwali, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Sri Santosh Kumar Singh Paliwali, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the instant application has rendered infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.8.2021 S Rawat
Pankaj Kumar @ Golu
Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
