Vikram Yadav @ Vijay Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The learned Single Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail application dated 10069 of 2021 as infructuous without recording substantive findings or reasons for the decision.
The learned Single Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail application dated 10069 of 2021 as infructuous without recording substantive findings or reasons for the decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10069 of 2021
Applicant :- Vikram Yadav @ Vijay Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shivakant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard Sri Shiva Kant Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Sri Shiva Kant Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the instant application has rendered infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.8.2021 S Rawat
Vikram Yadav
State of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court