Prashant Trivedi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses an anticipatory bail application u/s 438 CrPC as infructuous because the charge sheet had already been submitted against the applicant.
This order dismisses an anticipatory bail application u/s 438 CrPC as infructuous because the charge sheet had already been submitted against the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9794 of 2021
Applicant :- Prashant Trivedi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhitosh Mishra,Pushpendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A. has informed the Court that the charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant on 02.01.2021.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application no more survives.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.8.2021 Sumit S
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application survives after the submission of the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prashant Trivedi
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court