Mohammad Naushad v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed anticipatory bail application as infructuous since the applicant had already secured regular bail.
Single judge dismissed anticipatory bail application as infructuous since the applicant had already secured regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14118 of 2021
Applicant :- Mohammad Naushad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that this anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous on account that the applicant has already been granted regular bail.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.8.2021 Sumit S
Mohammad Naushad
State of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court