Ghanshyam Verma v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9470 of 2021
Applicant :- Ghanshyam Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Kumar,Aman Arya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anand Kumar Mishra,Rajiv Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
By means of the present application the applicant, Ghanshyam Verma is seeking his anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.287 of 2020, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Mundali, District-Meerut.
From the record, it is evident that the applicant has approached this Court after getting her anticipatory bail rejected from the Court of Session vide order dated 22.03.2021.
Keeping in view the rampant corruption involved in this matter in which there is siphoning of huge amount involved in the matter and the investigation is going on and it would not be proper for the Court to interfere in the same.
Taking into account the role attributed to the applicant in commission of offence, the Court feels that in order to have indepth probe into the matter, the Investigating Officer of the case should be given fullest liberty to choose its own course for the transparent investigation. Thus, giving a panoramic view of the matter the Court is not inclined to exercise its powers in favour of the applicants, and thus the present anticipatory bail application is hereby REJECTED. Order Date :- 18.8.2021 Abhishek Sri.
Digitally signed by RAHUL CHATURVEDI Date: 2021.08.19 14:43:48 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghanshyam Verma
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court