Mahim Chandra Bhurji v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was arrested by police during the pendency of the proceedings.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was arrested by police during the pendency of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14416 of 2021
Applicant :- Mahim Chandra Bhurji Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, the applicant was arrested by the police.
Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 18.8.2021 Sumit S
Mahim Chandra Bhurji
State Of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court