Held that the anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared to press the matter even after revised list, indicating it is either infructuous or applicant has been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9014 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Even after revised list, none is for the applicant to press this application. It appears that either this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous or applicant has been arrested.
Learned AGA is present.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 Dhirendra/
Rajesh
State of U.P.
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
