Ajay Azad v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as final report submitted indicating no apprehension of arrest.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as final report submitted indicating no apprehension of arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2061 of 2020
Applicant :- Ajay Azad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajan Srivastava,Pooja Srivastava,Vinod Prakash Srivastava (Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Learned A.G.A. mentioned that final report has been filed against the applicant, hence, there is no apprehension of arrest by police.
As final report has been submitted and there is no apprehension of arrest, hence, this application is to be disposed of, as such.
Order Date :- 15.12.2021 Kamarjahan
Ajay Azad
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court