Prem Paswsan @ Prem Shankar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge, noting no appearance for the applicants, rejected the anticipatory bail application for non-prosecution.
The single judge, noting no appearance for the applicants, rejected the anticipatory bail application for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8687 of 2021
Applicant :- Prem Paswsan @ Prem Shankar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- R.K. Singh. Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None appears on behalf of the applicants to press this bail application.
From perusal of the order sheet, it appears that on the previous two occasions also, none was present on behalf of the applicants.
Learned A.G.A. submits that charge sheet has already been filed and the applicant may avail the liberty of regular bail.
Hence, the anticipatory bail application is rejected for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.8.2021
Pr/-
Prem Paswan @ Prem Shankar And 3 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court