Kamal Prasad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as the investigation had concluded and the police did not apprehend arrest.
Application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as the investigation had concluded and the police did not apprehend arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8287 of 2021
Applicant :- Kamal Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Subash Chandra Srivastava,Rampyare Lal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant mentioned that in this very case crime number, police report under Section 169 of Cr.P.C. has been filed.
As investigation resulted in final report, hence, there is no apprehension of arrest by police.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021 Kamarjahan
Kamal Prasad
State Of U.P.
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court