In this anticipatory bail application, the applicant explicitly submitted that he did not wish to pursue the application. Relying on this submission, the court rejected the petition as not pressed, effectively dismissing the plea without a substantive merit analysis.
Nulla effectus; anticipatory bail application rejected as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7995 of 2021
Applicant :- Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Digvijay Tiwari
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in this matter charge sheet has already been filed.
Similarly, it has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the informant that an application under Section 482 No. 26660 of 2017 was given, which was decided on 23.8.2017 and which resulted in the dismissal of the application and the applicant was directed to apply for bail within two months from the date of the order.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected as not pressed.
Order Date :- 7.9.2021
Mini
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain an anticipatory bail application which the applicant has decided not to press.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pratap Singh
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
