Allowed

Sayed Saydan and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC15 Mar 2021ABAIL/7872/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the applicants for a period of 45 days or until cognizance is taken, subject to standard conditions including police cooperation, non-inducement, and passport deposit, while directing the investigation agency to conclude proceedings expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail for 45 days or till cognizance is taken, subject to personal bond and standard conditions.

Sayed Saydan and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7872 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Sayed Saydan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Yadavendra Dwivedi

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Sayed Saydan and Syed Faizan , with a prayer to release them on bail in Complaint Case No. 45 of 2021, under Sections- 420, 406 and 506 IPC, Police StationRamgarh Taal, District- Gorakhpur, during pendency of trial.

¶8

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused, they deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of 45 days or till the cognizance is taken by the Magistrate on the police report submitted u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court, whichever is earlier, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court, subject to the following conditions :-

¶9

(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;

¶10

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶11

(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶12

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶13

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the

¶14

official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶15

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

¶16

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.

¶17

The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶18

Order Date :- 15.3.2021 Rohit

Sayed Saydan and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayed Saydan and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Rawat Vs State of U.P.

Kuldeep Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Arsad @ Pappu Vs State of U.P.

Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Rajendra Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajeev and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another