Allowed

Deepak Rawat v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Mar 2021ABAIL/357/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Deepak Rawat protected under section 438 Cr.P.C. He was enlarged for 45 days or till cognizance on a personal bond. The judgment imposes standard conditions including availability for interrogation and restrictions on travel and influencing witnesses. The investigating officer is directed to conclude the investigation expeditiously without p

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for 45 days or till cognizance on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.

Deepak Rawat Vs State of U.P. — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 357 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Deepak Rawat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Deepak Rawat , with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 476 of 2020 , under Sections- 498-A,323,506 I.P.C., Police Station- Badalpur , District- Gautam Budh Nagar, during pendency of trial.

¶6

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused, he deserves to be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of 45 days or till the cognizance is taken by the Magistrate on the police report submitted u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court whichever is earlier on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court, subject to the following conditions :-

¶7

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;

¶8

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶9

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶10

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶11

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶12

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶13

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this

¶14

Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶15

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶16

Order Date :- 12.3.2021

¶17

Atul kr. sri.

Deepak Rawat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Rawat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunwar Krishna Agrawal Vs State of U.P.

Geeta Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Tara Chandra Vs State of U.P.

Shamshad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ranno Devi Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Alias Sachin Vs State of U.P.