Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter despite multiple listings.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7032 of 2021
Applicant :- Ashok Ram Dular Vishwakrma @ Ashok Vishwakrma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Smt. Ushma Mishra,Ram Manohar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.
Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State is present.
Previously the matter was listed on 17.05.2021, 09.06.2021 and there was no representation on behalf of the applicant.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.12.2021 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Ram Dular Vishwakrma @ Ashok Vishwakrma
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
