Imtiyaz Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14207 of 2021
Applicant :- Imtiyaz Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sami Ullah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.
Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 8.12.2021 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Imtiyaz Ahmad
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/14207/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court