Allowed

Mohsin and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Mar 2021ABAIL/5964/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Siddharth, J. granted anticipatory bail to Mohsin and others in a criminal case under Sections 147, 323, 504, 436, 429, and 506 IPC. Bail was granted for 45 days or until cognizance, subject to bonds and standard conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for a period of 45 days or till cognizance is taken, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties each and complying with specified conditions.

Mohsin and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5964 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Mohsin And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Bahadur Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Irfanul Huda

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Irfanul Huda, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶7

This exemption application is allowed.

¶8

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

¶9

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Mohsin, Chandu @ Ansar, Raju @ Nausad and Mursaleen with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 38 of 2021, under Sections- 147, 323, 504, 436, 429, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Thathiya, DistrictKannauj, during pendency of trial.

¶10

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused persons, they deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of 45 days or till the cognizance is taken by the Magistrate on the police report submitted u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court, whichever is earlier, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court, subject to the following conditions :-

¶11

(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;

¶12

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶13

(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous

¶14

permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶15

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶17

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

¶18

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.

¶19

The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶20

Order Date :- 19.3.2021 KS

Mohsin and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohsin and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malkit Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sachin and Another Vs State of U.P.

Brijesh @ Rohit Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P and 3 Others

Randeep Waraich Vs State of U.P.

Rohit Samadhiya @ Ramakant Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jay Singh Vs State of U.P.