Ranno Devi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single line order rejecting anticipatory bail application filed by Ranno Devi as barred by Section 438(6) of the Cr.P.C. pursuant to U.P. Amendment.
What did the court decide?
Rejection of anticipatory bail application due to bar under Section 438(6) Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4681 of 2021
Applicant :- Ranno Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawnesh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mani Shankar
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ranno Devi, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 672 of 2020, under Sections 323, 302 I.P.C, Police Station- Sarai Akil, District- Kaushambi, during pendency of trial.
This anticipatory bail application is barred by Section 438(6) Cr.P.C (U.P. Amendment).
It is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 12.3.2021 SS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the filed anticipatory bail application is barred under Section 438(6) of the Cr.P.C. due to U.P. Amendment.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ranno Devi
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4681/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court